Comodo[kS] vs IllIIIIllIlIlIl PvT

Comodo[kS]

42 Overall score

vs 72 PvT games at 1917-2317

IllIIIIllIlIlIl

54 Overall score

vs 61 TvP games at 1848-2248

What usually separates winnersFor each player, these are other games with the same race matchup and a similar rating—not a comparison between the players in this replay.

Lower is better for supply blocks, production idle and idle workers; higher is better for map vision.

Comodo[kS]

P vs T · rating 1917–2317

Production dormancy Other-game winners 38.2% n=33 Other-game losers 38.9% n=39

Supply blocked Other-game winners 5.8% n=33 Other-game losers 6.5% n=39

Worker idle Other-game winners 4.1% n=33 Other-game losers 3.8% n=39

Map vision Other-game winners 16.8% n=33 Other-game losers 11.3% n=39

IllIIIIllIlIlIl

T vs P · rating 1848–2248

Production dormancy Other-game winners 46.5% n=28 Other-game losers 48.5% n=32

Supply blocked Other-game winners 7.2% n=28 Other-game losers 6.1% n=33

Worker idle Other-game winners 3.7% n=28 Other-game losers 5.1% n=33

Map vision Other-game winners 11.1% n=28 Other-game losers 11.5% n=33

Head to head

More fill means better performance; compare against similar players.

Comodo[kS] IllIIIIllIlIlIl

375APM251

243EAPM184

80Split score92

—Damage given—

—Damage received—

Lower is better

—Kills—

0Fights won0

0Value traded0

0Workers lost0

Lower is better

Comodo[kS] APM EAPM

IllIIIIllIlIlIl APM EAPM